Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-04-21 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2005-04-21 House Journal Page 1195 HB 130 CSHB 130(FIN) am was again before the House in second reading with Amendment No. 6 pending. Representative Salmon moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Ramras objected. 2005-04-21 House Journal Page 1196 Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Kerttula was required to vote. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that Representative Joule be excused from a call of the House to 7:30 p.m., today. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 130(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Kerttula, Salmon, Thomas Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Elkins, Harris, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Wilson Excused: Gatto, Joule, Seaton Absent: Holm, Kapsner, Moses And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 130(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 130(FIN) am was read the third time. Representative Coghill rose to a point of order. 2005-04-21 House Journal Page 1197 The Speaker cautioned members to refrain from impugning the motives of other members. The question being: "Shall CSHB 130(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 130(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 32 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kapsner, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch Nays: Berkowitz, Kerttula, Moses, Neuman, Wilson Excused: Gatto, Joule, Seaton And so, CSHB 130(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. Representative Berkowitz objected. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 130(FIN) am Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 36 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson 2005-04-21 House Journal Page 1198 Excused: Gatto, Joule, Seaton Absent: Foster And so, the effective date clause was adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the House adopt the House Finance Committee letter of intent (page 1015). There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Kerttula gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 130(FIN) am.